home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: informatik.tu-muenchen.de!fischerj
- From: fischerj@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Juergen "Rally" Fischer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: WriteChunkyPixels() and gfx cards/cgfx
- Date: 15 Apr 1996 15:10:24 GMT
- Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4ktot0$c3j@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- References: <503.6668T1010T1244@Redrobe.demon.co.uk> <51E03399@tn.village.it>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
- Originator: fischerj@hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-
-
- In article <51E03399@tn.village.it>, ggreco@tn.village.it (Gabriele Greco) writes:
- |> Hello Mike,
- |> In a message dated 04 Apr 96 you wrote to All :
- |>
- |> MR> In the autodocs this is supposed to be for a pointer to custom c2p
- |> MR> hardware... the CV64 has c2p hardware, so will this flag tell me?
- |> MR> ...or am I best using WritePixelArray8 (for gfx cards)
- |>
- |> On my PicassoII (with village software) I see that WritePixelArray8 is
- |> istantaneous while with WriteChunkyPixel i see the image been plotted...
- |>
- |> I deduced that picasso soft patched only WritePixelArray8...
-
- IMHO writechunkypixels is newer than the driver, so it can't patch.
-
- |>
- |> I've tried also my routine on a CD32 and akiko doesn't do a great job...
- |>
- |> WritePixelArray on picasso is far faster than WriteChunkyPixel+Akiko...
-
- Do I interpret right AKIKO only works on WriteChunkyPixel ?
- Anyway, if you got fastram blitter beats AKIKO (in games).
-
- |>
- |> (I've tried on an area of 48x48 points)
- |>
- |> Ciao,
- |> Gabry
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) =:)
-
-